Home

Corn Export Cargo Quality Report 2016/2017

Contents

  1. Export Cargo Quality Highlights
  2. Introduction
  3. Quality Test Results
  4. Moisture
  5. Chemical Composition
  6. Physical Factors
  7. Mycotoxins
  8. U.S. Corn Export System
  9. U.S. Corn Export Flow
  10. Impact of the Corn Market Channel on Quality
  11. U.S. Government Inspection and Grading
  12. Survey & Statistical Analysis Methods
  13. Survey Design and Sampling
  14. Statistical Analysis
  15. Testing Analysis Methods
  16. Moisture
  17. Chemical Composition
  18. Physical Factors
  19. Mycotoxin Testing
  20. U.S. Corn Grades And Requirements
Download report

B. SURVEY DESIGN AND SAMPLING

Survey Design

For the 2016/2017 Export Cargo Report, the target population was yellow commodity corn from the 12 key U.S. corn-producing states representing an estimated 93.1% of the 2016/2017 U.S. corn exports. A proportionate stratified sampling technique was used to ensure a sound statistical sampling of U.S. yellow corn exports. Two key characteristics define the sampling technique for this report: the stratification of the population to be sampled and the sampling proportion per subpopulation or stratum.

Stratification involves dividing the survey population of interest into subpopulations called strata. For the Export Cargo Reports, the key corn-exporting areas in the United States are divided into three geographical groupings, which we refer to as Export Catchment Areas (ECAs). These three ECAs are identified by the three major pathways to export markets:

  1. The Gulf ECA consists of areas that typically export corn through U.S. Gulf ports;
  2. The Pacific Northwest ECA includes areas that usually export corn through Pacific Northwest and California ports; and
  3. The Southern Rail ECA comprises areas that generally export corn by rail to Mexico.

Using data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), each ECA’s proportion of the total expected annual yellow corn exports for the 2016/2017 corn marketing year was calculated. This average share of exports was used to determine the sampling proportion (the percent of total samples per ECA) and, ultimately, the number of yellow corn samples to be collected from each ECA. The specified sampling proportions for the three ECAs are shown below.

The number of samples collected within each ECA was established so the Council could estimate the true averages of the various quality factors with a certain level of precision. The level of precision chosen for the Export Cargo Report was a Relative ME of not more than ±10%. A Relative ME of ±10% is a reasonable target for biological data such as these corn quality factors.

To determine the number of samples for the targeted Relative ME, ideally the population variance (i.e., variability of the quality factor in the corn exports) for each of the quality factors should be used. The more variation among the levels or values of a quality factor, the more samples needed to estimate the true mean with a given confdence limit. In addition, the variances of the quality factors typically differ from one another. As a result, different sample sizes for each of the quality factors would be needed for the same level of precision.
Since the population variances for the 15 quality factors evaluated for this year’s corn exports were not known, the variance estimates from last year’s Export Cargo Report were used as estimates of the population variance.

The variances and ultimately the estimated number of samples needed for the Relative ME of ±10% for 12 quality factors were calculated using the 2015/2016 results of 408 samples. Heat damage, 100-k weight, and kernel volume were not examined. Based on these data, a total sample size of 430 would allow the Council to estimate the true averages of the quality characteristics with the desired level of precision for the U.S. Aggregate. Applying the sampling proportions previously defined to the total of 430 samples resulted in the following number of targeted samples from each ECA (shown in table).

Sampling

The sampling was administered by FGIS and participating official service providers as part of their inspection services. The FGIS field offices indicated that 2016 corn was reaching export points in October 2016. Therefore, FGIS sent instruction letters to the Gulf and Pacific Northwest field offices and to the domestic inspections office, and the sampling period began December 1, 2016, for the three ECAs. The FGIS field offices in the respective ECAs responsible for overseeing the sample collection within their region were as follows: Gulf – New Orleans, Louisiana; Pacific Northwest – Olympia, Washington (Washington State Department of Agriculture); and Southern Rail – FGIS Domestic Inspection Operations Office in Kansas City, Missouri.

While the sampling process is continuous throughout loading, a shipment or “lot” of corn is divided into “sublots” for the purpose of determining uniformity of quality. Sublot size is based on the hourly loading rate of the elevator and the capacity of the vessel being loaded. Sublot sizes range from 30,000 to 120,000 bushels. All sublot samples are inspected to ensure the entire shipment is uniform in quality.

Representative sublot samples from the ports in the Gulf and Pacific Northwest ECAs were collected as ships were loaded, and only lots for which quantitative aflatoxin testing was being performed were to be sampled. Samples for grading are obtained by a diverter sampling device approved by FGIS. The diverter sampler “cuts” (or diverts) a representative portion at periodic intervals from a moving stream of corn. A cut occurs every few seconds, or about every 200 to 500 bushels (about 5.1 to 12.7 metric tons), as the grain is being assembled for export. The frequency is regulated by an electronic timer controlled by official inspection personnel, who periodically determine that the mechanical sampler is functioning properly. The same sampling frequency for the Pacific Northwest and Gulf ECAs as last year’s export cargo survey was used for this year’s survey. Therefore, sublots ending in 0, 3, 5, and 7 from each lot during the survey period were sampled. For the Southern Rail samples, a representative sample was taken at domestic interior elevators using a diverter sampler to ensure uniform sampling. A cut is taken about every 200 bushels (about 5.1 metric tons). A composite sample was made from unit trains of yellow corn inspected for export to Mexico and for which quantitative aflatoxin testing was being performed.

For each sample, a minimum of 2,700 grams was collected by the FGIS field staff, the Southern Rail ECA official service providers, and the Washington State Department of Agriculture. The samples were congregated at the field offices and mailed to Illinois Crop Improvement Association’s Identity Preserved Grain Laboratory (IPG Lab). Refer to the “Testing Analysis Methods” section for the description of the testing methods employed for the study.

The sampling period ended when the targeted number of samples per ECA was reached – February 16, 2017, for the Pacific Northwest ECA; February 23, 2017, for the Gulf ECA; and March 16, 2017, for the Southern Rail ECA.